FEMR vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEMR (Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMR is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. FEMR is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past year, FEMR returned 64.21% vs 157.20% for SMH. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMR charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

FEMR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMR achieves a 34.71% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.

FEMR

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 11.47%
• YTD: 34.71%
• 6M: 39.19%
• 1Y: 64.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 25.87%
• YTD: 77.13%
• 6M: 75.61%
• 1Y: 157.20%
• 3Y*: 64.17%
• 5Y*: 39.21%
• 10Y*: 37.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF	34.71%	35.27%	-1.49%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	77.13%	49.17%	-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMR and SMH is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024	0.69

The correlation between FEMR and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEMR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMR

FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 86
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEMR	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.05	5.19	-2.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	5.22	-1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.72	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	10.59	-6.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.85	40.63	-22.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEMR vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMR and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEMR	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.05	5.19	-2.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.22	0.34	+1.88

Drawdowns

FEMR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMR drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMR and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMR	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-84.96%	+69.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-14.93%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	0.00%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-41.09%	+38.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	3.89%	-0.28%

Volatility

FEMR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) is 8.63%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that FEMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMR	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.63%	11.47%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.52%	24.29%	-5.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.17%	30.56%	-9.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.28%	35.01%	-13.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.28%	32.57%	-11.29%

FEMR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FEMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF	1.39%	1.92%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.17%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMR and SMH in my portfolio?

FEMR and SMH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEMR or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to FEMR (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMR dropped -15.58% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, FEMR or SMH?

On 1-year performance, SMH leads with 157.20% vs 64.21% for FEMR. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FEMR has been the lower-risk option at 8.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEMR or SMH?

Over the 1-year period, SMH has performed better with a 157.20% return vs 64.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMR or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FEMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMR or SMH?

FEMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.

What is the main difference between FEMR and SMH?

FEMR is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FEMR and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.