FEMR vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

FEMR (Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMR is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Fidelity, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEMR returned 48.77% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. FEMR charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

FEMR vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMR achieves a 27.74% return, which is significantly higher than RSBY's 18.52% return.

FEMR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: 21.79%
• YTD: 27.74%
• 1Y: 48.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 17.92%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMR vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF	27.74%	35.27%	-1.48%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.52%	-12.98%	0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMR and RSBY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	-0.22

Return for Risk

FEMR vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMR

FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 78
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMR vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMR	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.50	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.18	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.26	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	2.15	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.01	5.04	+6.97

FEMR vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMR Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMR and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEMR vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMR drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMR and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMR	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-23.32%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-7.95%	-6.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.97%	-6.45%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-13.35%	+10.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	3.39%	+0.66%

Volatility

FEMR vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that FEMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMR	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	3.15%	+7.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.18%	8.37%	+13.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.22%	11.41%	+12.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.86%	13.37%	+9.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.86%	13.37%	+9.49%

FEMR vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMR vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

FEMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than RSBY's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF	1.49%	1.92%	0.37%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMR and RSBY in my portfolio?

FEMR and RSBY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEMR or RSBY?

FEMR has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMR dropped -15.58% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, FEMR or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, FEMR leads with 48.77% vs 17.35% for RSBY. On fees, FEMR is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEMR or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, FEMR has performed better with a 48.77% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMR or RSBY?

FEMR is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMR or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.49% for FEMR.

What is the main difference between FEMR and RSBY?

FEMR is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FEMR and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.