PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMR vs. AVXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMR vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMR achieves a 29.38% return, which is significantly lower than AVXC's 31.52% return.


FEMR

1D
-5.78%
1M
3.04%
YTD
29.38%
6M
31.28%
1Y
55.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVXC

1D
-5.67%
1M
3.81%
YTD
31.52%
6M
32.82%
1Y
56.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMR vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
29.38%35.27%-1.48%
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
31.52%31.45%-2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMR and AVXC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.87

The correlation between FEMR and AVXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMR vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMR
FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMR vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMRAVXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

4.02

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.57

15.56

-0.99

FEMR vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMR Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMR and AVXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMR vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMR drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum AVXC drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMR and AVXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMRAVXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-20.44%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-14.04%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-5.67%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-3.79%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

3.62%

+0.18%

Volatility

FEMR vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) have volatilities of 12.62% and 13.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMRAVXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.62%

13.12%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.66%

21.15%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.80%

23.03%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

19.83%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.78%

19.83%

+2.95%

FEMR vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMR vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

FEMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than AVXC's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
2.06%1.97%1.34%
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
1.48%1.92%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMR and AVXC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to FEMR (12.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMR dropped -15.58% vs AVXC's -20.44%.

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 56.20% vs 55.15% for FEMR. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FEMR has been the lower-risk option at 12.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 56.20% return vs 55.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FEMR.

AVXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.48% for FEMR.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FEMR and 0.33% for AVXC.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMR and AVXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer