PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMR vs. AVXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMR vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEMR having a 35.27% return and AVXC slightly higher at 36.02%.


FEMR

1D
0.55%
1M
12.50%
YTD
35.27%
6M
39.81%
1Y
65.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVXC

1D
0.46%
1M
12.24%
YTD
36.02%
6M
40.49%
1Y
64.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMR vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
35.27%35.27%-1.49%
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
36.02%31.45%-2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMR and AVXC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.87

The correlation between FEMR and AVXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMR vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMR
FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMR vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEMRAVXCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.11

3.26

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.91

4.15

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.58

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

4.71

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.50

19.11

-0.61

FEMR vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMR and AVXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMRAVXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

3.26

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.25

1.63

+0.62

Drawdowns

FEMR vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMR drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum AVXC drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMR and AVXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMRAVXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-20.44%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-14.04%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-3.79%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.46%

+0.15%

Volatility

FEMR vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) have volatilities of 8.58% and 8.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMRAVXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

8.78%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

17.60%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.16%

20.01%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.30%

18.45%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

18.45%

+2.85%

FEMR vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMR vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

FEMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than AVXC's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.47%1.97%1.34%
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
1.39%1.92%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMR and AVXC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to FEMR (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMR dropped -15.58% vs AVXC's -20.44%.

On 1-year performance, FEMR leads with 65.47% vs 64.85% for AVXC. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FEMR has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEMR has performed better with a 65.47% return vs 64.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FEMR.

AVXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.39% for FEMR.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis Investors. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FEMR and 0.33% for AVXC.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMR and AVXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer