FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L
FEMQ.L (Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF) and PRAM.L (Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Fidelity and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEMQ.L returned 23.41%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for PRAM.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMQ.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PRAM.L.
Performance
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEMQ.L is traded in GBP, while PRAM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRAM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMQ.L achieves a 34.78% return, which is significantly higher than PRAM.L's 24.77% return.
FEMQ.L
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 10.66%
- YTD
- 34.78%
- 6M
- 35.19%
- 1Y
- 57.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PRAM.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 24.77%
- 6M
- 26.35%
- 1Y
- 51.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMQ.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF | 34.78% | 20.96% | 6.49% | 9.64% | -15.02% | 0.21% |
PRAM.L Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 24.77% | 23.16% | 9.01% | 3.99% | -8.64% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMQ.L and PRAM.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FEMQ.L and PRAM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Financial Services
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Consumer Cyclical
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Industrials
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Basic Materials
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Energy
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Communication Services
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Consumer Defensive
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Healthcare
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Utilities
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Real Estate
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEMQ.L
PRAM.L
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMQ.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMQ.L | PRAM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.52 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.48 | 4.98 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.32 | 16.58 | +4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMQ.L | PRAM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 2.84 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.82 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMQ.L drawdown since its inception was -28.13%, which is greater than PRAM.L's maximum drawdown of -15.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMQ.L and PRAM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMQ.L | PRAM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.13% | -15.77% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -10.26% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -15.77% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -2.78% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -4.79% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.08% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF (FEMQ.L) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) at 7.80%. This indicates that FEMQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMQ.L | PRAM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 7.80% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 15.43% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 18.02% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 18.89% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 18.89% | -1.39% |
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMQ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAM.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMQ.L vs. PRAM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEMQ.L nor PRAM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMQ.L and PRAM.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEMQ.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEMQ.L and 0.10% for PRAM.L.
Find the right allocation for FEMQ.L and PRAM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer