PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEML.L vs. TEDMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEML.L vs. TEDMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd (FEML.L) and Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEML.L is traded in GBp, while TEDMX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TEDMX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEML.L achieves a 38.84% return, which is significantly lower than TEDMX's 41.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEML.L having a 13.48% annualized return and TEDMX not far ahead at 14.05%.


FEML.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.71%
YTD
38.84%
6M
47.41%
1Y
99.04%
3Y*
38.38%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
13.48%

TEDMX

1D
-1.96%
1M
9.25%
YTD
41.15%
6M
42.44%
1Y
78.47%
3Y*
28.71%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEML.L vs. TEDMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEML.L
Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd
38.84%56.56%15.43%4.91%-25.02%-6.28%14.12%26.96%-9.86%21.64%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
41.15%34.40%10.03%6.66%-12.92%-4.92%15.16%21.58%-11.24%28.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FEML.L and TEDMX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.53

The correlation between FEML.L and TEDMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEML.L vs. TEDMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEML.L
FEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TEDMX
TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEML.L vs. TEDMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd (FEML.L) and Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEML.LTEDMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.81

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.61

6.27

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.71

23.37

+3.34

FEML.L vs. TEDMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.45, which is comparable to the TEDMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEML.L and TEDMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEML.LTEDMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.45

4.26

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.78

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.39

+0.11

Drawdowns

FEML.L vs. TEDMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEML.L drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than TEDMX's maximum drawdown of -51.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEML.L and TEDMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEML.LTEDMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-51.25%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-12.75%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

-15.50%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.00%

-30.09%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.51%

-33.57%

-6.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-2.51%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-13.31%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.41%

+0.30%

Volatility

FEML.L vs. TEDMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd (FEML.L) is 6.76%, while Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that FEML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEDMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEML.LTEDMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

8.64%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.58%

16.26%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

18.80%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

17.36%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

18.13%

+0.17%

Dividends

FEML.L vs. TEDMX - Dividend Comparison

FEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than TEDMX's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEML.L
Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd
1.34%1.86%2.26%2.48%2.26%1.64%1.45%1.87%2.32%1.47%0.00%0.00%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
1.88%2.64%3.30%3.44%5.25%6.76%2.40%4.54%1.35%0.90%1.20%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEML.L and TEDMX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEML.L and TEDMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer