FEML.L vs. BRWM.L
FEML.L (Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd) and BRWM.L (Blackrock World Mining Trust plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — FEML.L in Asset Management, BRWM.L in Collective Investments. Over the past 10 years, FEML.L returned 11.28%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for BRWM.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEML.L achieves a 34.52% return, which is significantly higher than BRWM.L's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FEML.L has underperformed BRWM.L with an annualized return of 11.28%, while BRWM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.57% annualized return.
FEML.L
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- YTD
- 34.52%
- 1Y
- 80.04%
- 3Y*
- 37.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
BRWM.L
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 61.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEML.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd | 34.52% | 56.56% | 15.43% | 4.39% | -25.29% | -6.66% | 13.69% | 26.41% | -10.32% | 21.20% |
BRWM.L Blackrock World Mining Trust plc | 10.35% | 74.19% | -12.62% | -10.48% | 26.00% | 17.51% | 46.41% | 19.43% | -10.72% | 24.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEML.L and BRWM.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2006 | 0.49 |
Fundamentals
FEML.L:
£903.58M
BRWM.L:
£1.63B
FEML.L:
$90.65M
BRWM.L:
£600.50M
FEML.L:
$90.65M
BRWM.L:
£584.93M
FEML.L:
-$10.72M
BRWM.L:
£508.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEML.L
BRWM.L
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd (FEML.L) and Blackrock World Mining Trust plc (BRWM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEML.L | BRWM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.27 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.31 | 2.88 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.03 | 8.63 | +11.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEML.L drawdown since its inception was -60.17%, smaller than the maximum BRWM.L drawdown of -77.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEML.L and BRWM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEML.L | BRWM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.17% | -77.45% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -21.31% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.98% | -32.66% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.41% | -39.58% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.75% | -41.99% | +1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -15.90% | +7.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.33% | -27.94% | +6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 7.13% | -3.15% |
Volatility
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd (FEML.L) is 9.10%, while Blackrock World Mining Trust plc (BRWM.L) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that FEML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRWM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEML.L | BRWM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.10% | 9.94% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.50% | 31.46% | -12.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 37.39% | -16.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 29.97% | -11.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 28.31% | -9.84% |
Dividends
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L - Dividend Comparison
FEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BRWM.L's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRWM.L Blackrock World Mining Trust plc | 2.74% | 2.86% | 6.96% | 6.81% | 6.24% | 4.04% | 4.21% | 5.48% | 4.58% | 4.53% | 5.35% | 11.60% |
FEML.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd | 1.38% | 1.86% | 2.26% | 1.99% | 1.90% | 1.22% | 1.10% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FEML.L vs. BRWM.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd and Blackrock World Mining Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FEML.L and BRWM.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FEML.L and BRWM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer