FEML.L vs. IWDP.L
FEML.L (Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd) is a stock, while IWDP.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP) is REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Over the past 10 years, FEML.L returned 11.28%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for IWDP.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEML.L vs. IWDP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEML.L achieves a 34.52% return, which is significantly higher than IWDP.L's 10.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FEML.L has outperformed IWDP.L with an annualized return of 11.28%, while IWDP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.84% annualized return.
FEML.L
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- YTD
- 34.52%
- 1Y
- 80.04%
- 3Y*
- 37.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
IWDP.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 14.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
FEML.L vs. IWDP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEML.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd | 34.52% | 56.56% | 15.43% | 4.39% | -25.29% | -6.66% | 13.69% | 26.41% | -10.32% | 21.20% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 10.12% | 1.72% | 1.23% | 3.99% | -14.93% | 26.93% | -12.50% | 17.32% | -0.09% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEML.L and IWDP.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2006 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FEML.L and IWDP.L has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEML.L vs. IWDP.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEML.L
IWDP.L
FEML.L vs. IWDP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd (FEML.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEML.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.22 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.31 | 1.64 | +3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.03 | 5.07 | +14.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEML.L vs. IWDP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEML.L drawdown since its inception was -60.17%, roughly equal to the maximum IWDP.L drawdown of -59.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEML.L and IWDP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEML.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.17% | -59.16% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -8.61% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.98% | -16.50% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.41% | -26.31% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.75% | -35.61% | -5.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -1.96% | -6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.33% | -11.08% | -10.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.79% | +1.19% |
Volatility
FEML.L vs. IWDP.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd (FEML.L) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) at 3.50%. This indicates that FEML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEML.L | IWDP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.10% | 3.50% | +5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.50% | 8.86% | +9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 11.05% | +9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 13.83% | +4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 15.41% | +3.06% |
Dividends
FEML.L vs. IWDP.L - Dividend Comparison
FEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than IWDP.L's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEML.L Fidelity Emerging Markets Ltd | 1.38% | 1.86% | 2.26% | 1.99% | 1.90% | 1.22% | 1.10% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWDP.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP | 2.94% | 3.14% | 3.18% | 3.14% | 3.56% | 2.17% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.82% | 3.05% | 2.96% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEML.L and IWDP.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FEML.L and IWDP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer