FEMG vs. PDP
FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while PDP is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. FEMG is actively managed, while PDP is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PDP.
Performance
FEMG vs. PDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 6M
- 24.18%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
FEMG vs. PDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.23% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 6.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMG and PDP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.48 |
FEMG vs. PDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEMG
PDP
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Industrials
FEMG
PDP
Technology
FEMG
PDP
Consumer Cyclical
FEMG
PDP
Healthcare
FEMG
PDP
Financial Services
FEMG
PDP
Energy
FEMG
PDP
Utilities
FEMG
PDP
Communication Services
FEMG
PDP
Real Estate
FEMG
PDP
Consumer Defensive
FEMG
PDP
Basic Materials
FEMG
PDP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMG vs. PDP — Risk / Return Rank
FEMG
PDP
FEMG vs. PDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMG | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.78 | 0.45 | +4.33 |
Drawdowns
FEMG vs. PDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum PDP drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and PDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMG | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -59.34% | +56.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | 0.00% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -10.61% | +9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility
FEMG vs. PDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMG | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 21.94% | -9.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 22.00% | -9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 21.59% | -9.30% |
FEMG vs. PDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PDP's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMG vs. PDP - Dividend Comparison
FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMG and PDP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.
PDP has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
FEMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PDP is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.62% for PDP.
Find the right allocation for FEMG and PDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer