FEMDX vs. PYELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX).
FEMDX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 23, 2006. PYELX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
FEMDX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEMDX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMDX Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund | 0.40% | 15.69% | 11.83% | 15.47% | -8.87% | 1.58% | 3.93% | 9.92% | -1.19% | 11.68% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | -3.61% | 19.79% | -3.48% | 13.16% | -11.28% | -7.83% | 1.79% | 13.92% | -8.16% | 15.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMDX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's -3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMDX has outperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 6.68%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.36% annualized return.
FEMDX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
PYELX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -3.61%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMDX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEMDX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMDX
PYELX
FEMDX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | 0.10 | +2.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.63 | 1.21 | +2.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.76 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 0.22 | +2.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 3.20 | +9.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 0.10 | +2.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.04 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 0.07 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.03 | +0.93 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMDX and PYELX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEMDX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison
FEMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, less than PYELX's 7.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMDX Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund | 6.46% | 6.49% | 4.65% | 3.12% | 9.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.29% | 8.06% | 4.29% | 0.69% | 6.04% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | 7.53% | 7.32% | 7.08% | 5.38% | 5.93% | 5.36% | 4.69% | 5.46% | 6.67% | 6.15% | 5.44% | 5.26% |
Drawdowns
FEMDX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMDX drawdown since its inception was -36.14%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMDX and PYELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.14% | -56.98% | +20.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -50.21% | +45.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.93% | -51.98% | +32.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.93% | -52.62% | +32.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -7.22% | +3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -16.96% | +12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 3.52% | -2.48% |
Volatility
FEMDX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) is 2.05%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that FEMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEMDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 3.37% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 4.62% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.88% | 112.02% | -107.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 50.59% | -44.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.89% | 36.37% | -30.48% |