PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMDX vs. FRDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMDX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMDX has underperformed FRDPX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while FRDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


FEMDX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.50%
YTD
8.24%
6M
8.76%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
7.08%

FRDPX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.76%
YTD
5.20%
6M
4.44%
1Y
13.66%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMDX
Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund
8.24%15.69%11.83%15.47%-8.87%1.58%3.93%9.92%-1.19%11.68%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
5.20%11.96%10.92%12.10%-10.69%26.62%16.29%29.83%-5.27%17.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMDX and FRDPX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2006

0.36

The correlation between FEMDX and FRDPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMDX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMDX
FEMDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FEMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMDXFRDPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.12

1.25

+0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.68

2.09

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.95

8.15

+18.79

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMDX Sharpe Ratio is 4.60, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMDX and FRDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMDX drawdown since its inception was -36.14%, smaller than the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMDX and FRDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMDXFRDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.14%

-51.57%

+15.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.54%

-7.10%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-18.26%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.93%

-21.07%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

-34.89%

+14.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.92%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-5.81%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

1.82%

-1.08%

Volatility

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) is 1.06%, while Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that FEMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMDXFRDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

2.79%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

7.83%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

10.28%

-5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

15.36%

-8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.91%

17.19%

-11.28%

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMDX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

FEMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than FRDPX's 9.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMDX
Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund
5.99%6.49%4.65%3.12%9.31%0.00%0.00%7.29%8.06%4.29%0.69%6.04%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
9.72%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMDX and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDPX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to FEMDX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMDX dropped -36.14% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.

FEMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.60 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMDX and FRDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer