FEMB vs. NFTY
FEMB (First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. FEMB is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEMB returned 1.87%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
FEMB vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -6.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMB has underperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 1.87%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
FEMB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
NFTY
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -7.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
FEMB vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 0.79% | 21.77% | -5.61% | 17.12% | -10.50% | -13.40% | 3.16% | 11.52% | -7.19% | 11.92% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -6.80% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 10.04% | 0.58% | -1.51% | 21.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMB and NFTY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMB vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
FEMB
NFTY
FEMB vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMB | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.93 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.44 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | -1.07 | +4.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMB vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMB | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.44% | -47.67% | +17.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -16.14% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.13% | -21.55% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -21.55% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.44% | -47.67% | +17.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -14.80% | +11.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -9.61% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 6.60% | -4.09% |
Volatility
FEMB vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) is 2.76%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that FEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMB | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 4.34% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 12.64% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.44% | 14.75% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.27% | 17.41% | -7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.85% | 20.71% | -9.86% |
FEMB vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMB vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than NFTY's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.65% | 5.67% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.90% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMB and NFTY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FEMB (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMB dropped -30.44% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 8.70% vs 1.87% for FEMB. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FEMB has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FEMB.
FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 1.90% for NFTY.
FEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FEMB and 0.80% for NFTY.
FEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEMB and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer