PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMB vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMB vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


FEMB

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.88%
1Y
10.20%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
2.51%

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMB vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
0.60%21.77%-5.61%17.12%-10.50%-13.40%3.16%11.52%-7.19%11.92%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMB and FTXL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMB vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMB
FEMB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMB vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEMBFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.78

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

15.62

-14.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.34

58.28

-53.94

FEMB vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMB and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMBFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

6.33

-5.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.97

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.94

-0.85

Drawdowns

FEMB vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMBFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

-43.87%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-14.51%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

-41.57%

+31.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.85%

-43.87%

+16.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

0.00%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-10.56%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.88%

-1.53%

Volatility

FEMB vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) is 3.05%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that FEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMBFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

14.28%

-11.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

28.98%

-22.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.36%

35.94%

-27.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.26%

36.02%

-25.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.99%

34.25%

-23.26%

FEMB vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMB vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
6.06%5.67%6.09%5.15%6.35%6.12%5.29%5.40%5.86%6.38%5.83%4.89%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMB and FTXL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to FEMB (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMB dropped -30.44% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 1.63% for FEMB. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FEMB has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FEMB.

FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.

FEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FEMB and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMB and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer