FEMB vs. EMHC
FEMB (First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF) and EMHC (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. FEMB is actively managed, while EMHC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEMB returned 1.63%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for EMHC. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for EMHC.
Performance
FEMB vs. EMHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than EMHC's 1.57% return.
FEMB
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 10.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
EMHC
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
FEMB vs. EMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 0.60% | 21.77% | -5.61% | 17.12% | -10.50% | -6.76% |
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 1.57% | 14.07% | 3.52% | 10.06% | -17.75% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMB and EMHC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between FEMB and EMHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMB vs. EMHC — Risk / Return Rank
FEMB
EMHC
FEMB vs. EMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.65 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 11.09 | -6.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.14 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.17 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.22 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FEMB vs. EMHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, which is greater than EMHC's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and EMHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.44% | -28.03% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -4.37% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.13% | -7.67% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.85% | -28.03% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -0.32% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -9.91% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.04% | +1.31% |
Volatility
FEMB vs. EMHC - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) at 1.89%. This indicates that FEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 1.89% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.57% | 4.16% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.36% | 5.43% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.26% | 9.06% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 8.96% | +2.03% |
FEMB vs. EMHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHC's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMB vs. EMHC - Dividend Comparison
FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, which matches EMHC's 6.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.11% | 6.16% | 5.95% | 5.12% | 5.11% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.06% | 5.67% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMB and EMHC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEMB has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to EMHC (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMB dropped -30.44% vs EMHC's -28.03%.
On 5-year performance, FEMB leads with 1.63% vs 1.55% for EMHC. On fees, EMHC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, EMHC has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FEMB has performed better with a 1.63% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMHC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FEMB.
EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 6.06% for FEMB.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FEMB and 0.23% for EMHC.
EMHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEMB and EMHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer