PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEM vs. DGRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEM vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEM achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 29.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEM having a 9.68% annualized return and DGRE not far behind at 9.47%.


FEM

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
20.27%
6M
22.14%
1Y
41.40%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
9.68%

DGRE

1D
-1.02%
1M
4.94%
YTD
29.96%
6M
35.37%
1Y
55.03%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEM vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
20.27%28.36%3.01%10.84%-14.24%7.40%-1.68%20.55%-15.51%41.05%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
29.96%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FEM and DGRE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2013

0.80

The correlation between FEM and DGRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEM vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEM
DGRE

Technology

24.5%
38.6%

Industrials

20.9%
7.8%

Energy

14.1%
1.1%

Basic Materials

8.6%
4.4%

Financial Services

7.0%
11.8%

Utilities

6.2%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
2.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
0.8%

Healthcare

3.1%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.3%

Technology

FEM
24.5%
DGRE
38.6%

Industrials

FEM
20.9%
DGRE
7.8%

Energy

FEM
14.1%
DGRE
1.1%

Basic Materials

FEM
8.6%
DGRE
4.4%

Financial Services

FEM
7.0%
DGRE
11.8%

Utilities

FEM
6.2%
DGRE
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FEM
5.7%
DGRE
2.7%

Communication Services

FEM
4.6%
DGRE
0.8%

Healthcare

FEM
3.1%
DGRE
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

FEM
2.8%
DGRE
2.3%

Real Estate

FEM
2.5%
DGRE
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEM vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEM
FEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEM vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEMDGREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

4.04

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.89

16.49

+0.40

FEM vs. DGRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the DGRE Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEM and DGRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMDGREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.75

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.47

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.48

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.32

-0.13

Drawdowns

FEM vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEM drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than DGRE's maximum drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM and DGRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMDGREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-36.95%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-13.68%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-20.65%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-34.82%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

-36.95%

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-1.96%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-12.00%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.35%

-0.89%

Volatility

FEM vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) is 6.05%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that FEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMDGREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

8.78%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.47%

18.02%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

20.11%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

18.12%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

19.64%

+1.32%

FEM vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEM vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison

FEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than DGRE's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.20%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%3.13%3.66%4.96%6.15%4.15%2.68%3.31%3.52%2.45%2.25%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEM and DGRE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to FEM (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEM dropped -46.23% vs DGRE's -36.95%.

On 10-year performance, FEM leads with 9.68% vs 9.47% for DGRE. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, FEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEM has performed better with a 9.68% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.

FEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.20% for DGRE.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM and 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEM and DGRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer