FELV vs. MDLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FELV (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF) and MDLV (Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FELV returned 29.77% vs 19.98% for MDLV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FELV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MDLV.

Performance

FELV vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELV achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than MDLV's 10.21% return.

FELV

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 29.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MDLV

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 6M: 11.06%
• 1Y: 19.98%
• 3Y*: 12.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELV vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	14.72%	15.80%	15.89%	7.19%
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	10.21%	13.30%	10.16%	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FELV and MDLV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.75

The correlation between FELV and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FELV vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FELV	MDLV
Technology	19.8%	9.3%
Financial Services	18.4%	14.9%
Industrials	12.5%	15.0%
Healthcare	10.1%	7.9%
Communication Services	8.2%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	3.9%
Energy	5.8%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	8.2%
Basic Materials	3.8%	2.6%
Utilities	3.4%	15.2%
Real Estate	3.3%	2.2%

Return for Risk

FELV vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELV

FELV Risk / Return Rank: 84
FELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FELV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FELV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

MDLV

MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 75
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELV vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELV	MDLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.29	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	3.35	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.39	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	4.70	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.85	14.78	+4.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FELV vs. MDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELV Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the MDLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELV and MDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELV	MDLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.29	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	1.06	+0.59

Drawdowns

FELV vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELV drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELV and MDLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELV	MDLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-10.71%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-4.27%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.08%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-2.29%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.36%	+0.22%

Volatility

FELV vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELV	MDLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	2.77%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	6.57%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	8.76%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.40%	10.52%	+2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.40%	10.52%	+2.88%

FELV vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FELV vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison

FELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than MDLV's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	1.51%	1.67%	2.02%	0.04%
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	2.80%	3.00%	2.78%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELV and MDLV in my portfolio?

FELV and MDLV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FELV or MDLV?

FELV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to MDLV (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELV dropped -16.08% vs MDLV's -10.71%.

Which ETF is better, FELV or MDLV?

On 1-year performance, FELV leads with 29.77% vs 19.98% for MDLV. On fees, FELV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FELV or MDLV?

Over the 1-year period, FELV has performed better with a 29.77% return vs 19.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FELV or MDLV?

FELV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FELV or MDLV?

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.51% for FELV.

What is the main difference between FELV and MDLV?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELV and 0.58% for MDLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.