FELV vs. FETH
FELV (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FELV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. FELV is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Over the past year, FELV returned 29.92% vs -28.45% for FETH. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FELV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FETH.
Performance
FELV vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELV achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -44.11% return.
FELV
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 29.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -19.46%
- YTD
- -44.11%
- 6M
- -44.07%
- 1Y
- -28.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FELV vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.80% | 4.17% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -44.11% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELV and FETH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELV vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
FELV
FETH
FELV vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FELV | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.98 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | -0.42 | +4.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.74 | -0.70 | +19.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FELV vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELV drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELV and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELV | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -67.57% | +51.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -67.57% | +60.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -65.81% | +64.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -33.69% | +31.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 40.48% | -38.88% |
Volatility
FELV vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) is 4.19%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 19.78%. This indicates that FELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELV | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 19.78% | -15.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 46.89% | -38.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 69.15% | -57.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 72.38% | -58.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 72.38% | -58.91% |
FELV vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FELV vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
FELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF | 1.49% | 1.67% | 2.02% | 0.04% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FELV and FETH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (19.78%) compared to FELV (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELV dropped -16.08% vs FETH's -67.57%.
On 1-year performance, FELV leads with 29.92% vs -28.45% for FETH. On fees, FELV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELV has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FELV has performed better with a 29.92% return vs -28.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FELV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FETH.
FELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FELV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELV and 0.25% for FETH.
FELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELV and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer