PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FELV vs. CBSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FELV vs. CBSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELV achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than CBSE's 27.35% return.


FELV

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.65%
YTD
15.89%
6M
15.09%
1Y
29.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBSE

1D
-3.39%
1M
1.47%
YTD
27.35%
6M
24.05%
1Y
42.24%
3Y*
30.51%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELV vs. CBSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FELV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
15.89%15.80%15.89%7.49%
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
27.35%19.53%32.20%11.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FELV and CBSE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.67

The correlation between FELV and CBSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FELV vs. CBSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELV
FELV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELV vs. CBSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FELVCBSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.29

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

3.13

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.74

9.09

+9.65

FELV vs. CBSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the CBSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELV and CBSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FELV vs. CBSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELV drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum CBSE drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELV and CBSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FELVCBSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.08%

-36.30%

+20.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-13.57%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-4.55%

+3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-12.24%

+10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

4.66%

-3.06%

Volatility

FELV vs. CBSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) is 4.19%, while Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) has a volatility of 12.55%. This indicates that FELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FELVCBSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

12.55%

-8.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

20.41%

-11.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

24.97%

-13.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

24.52%

-11.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.47%

24.12%

-10.65%

FELV vs. CBSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CBSE's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FELV vs. CBSE - Dividend Comparison

FELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than CBSE's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.27%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%
FELV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
1.49%1.67%2.02%0.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FELV and CBSE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBSE has higher volatility (12.55%) compared to FELV (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELV dropped -16.08% vs CBSE's -36.30%.

On 1-year performance, CBSE leads with 42.24% vs 29.92% for FELV. On fees, FELV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELV has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CBSE has performed better with a 42.24% return vs 29.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FELV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.

FELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.27% for CBSE.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Clough. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELV and 0.85% for CBSE.

FELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FELV and CBSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer