FELTX vs. SLMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class M (FELTX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX).
FELTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983.
Performance
FELTX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FELTX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELTX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class M | 0.20% | 44.53% | 43.39% | 74.66% | -35.23% | 57.08% | 43.20% | 63.20% | -13.06% | 33.66% |
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 0.17% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -8.12% | 34.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELTX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than SLMCX's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FELTX has outperformed SLMCX with an annualized return of 29.26%, while SLMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 22.20% annualized return.
FELTX
- 1D
- -4.26%
- 1M
- -10.03%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 76.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.72%
- 5Y*
- 27.48%
- 10Y*
- 29.26%
SLMCX
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 58.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FELTX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELTX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FELTX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank
FELTX
SLMCX
FELTX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class M (FELTX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELTX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.90 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.46 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.54 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.71 | 13.44 | +2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELTX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.90 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.69 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between FELTX and SLMCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FELTX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison
FELTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, less than SLMCX's 9.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELTX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class M | 7.34% | 7.35% | 7.56% | 3.64% | 3.54% | 4.50% | 4.56% | 0.95% | 20.90% | 9.73% | 0.13% | 10.79% |
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 9.44% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
Drawdowns
FELTX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELTX drawdown since its inception was -71.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SLMCX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELTX and SLMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELTX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.50% | -68.10% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.10% | -14.88% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.25% | -37.32% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.25% | -37.32% | -8.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.69% | -11.96% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.55% | -13.05% | -9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 3.93% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FELTX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class M (FELTX) has a higher volatility of 10.50% compared to Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) at 9.50%. This indicates that FELTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FELTX | SLMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.50% | 9.50% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.75% | 21.01% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.67% | 30.59% | +9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.96% | 25.96% | +12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.35% | 25.93% | +8.42% |