FELG vs. FESM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM).

FELG and FESM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FELG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 20, 2023. FESM is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.

Performance

FELG vs. FESM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FELG vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	-9.08%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	1.59%	17.88%	16.22%	12.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a -9.08% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 1.59% return.

FELG

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.08%
• 6M: -8.16%
• 1Y: 19.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FESM

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -4.92%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 30.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELG vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.

FESM

Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF

FELG

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

FELG vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 48
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 45

FESM

FESM Risk / Return Rank: 73
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELG vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELG	FESM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.34	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.91	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.25	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	2.27	-0.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	8.66	-4.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FELG vs. FESM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELG Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the FESM Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELG and FESM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELG	FESM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.34	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.98	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FELG and FESM is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FELG vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison

FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than FESM's 0.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.40%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	0.63%	0.82%	1.08%	0.06%

Drawdowns

FELG vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum FESM drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and FESM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELG	FESM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.89%	-26.93%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-13.54%	-2.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.99%	-6.52%	-5.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.57%	-5.04%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	3.55%	+1.18%

Volatility

FELG vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) have volatilities of 6.95% and 7.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELG	FESM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.95%	7.30%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	14.27%	-1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.60%	22.99%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.23%	21.48%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.23%	21.48%	-1.25%