FELG vs. FDSSX
FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) and FDSSX (Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past year, FELG returned 23.38% vs 37.42% for FDSSX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FELG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FDSSX.
Performance
FELG vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 15.71% return.
FELG
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDSSX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 37.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
FELG vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 4.10% | 18.44% | 35.45% | 4.20% |
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund | 15.71% | 18.89% | 19.79% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELG and FDSSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FELG and FDSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELG vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank
FELG
FDSSX
FELG vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELG | FDSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.52 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 4.05 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.96 | 19.61 | -14.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELG | FDSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.87 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.63 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
FELG vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and FDSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELG | FDSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.89% | -56.77% | +32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -9.19% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -0.11% | -4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -9.88% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 1.90% | +2.83% |
Volatility
FELG vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) at 3.41%. This indicates that FELG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELG | FDSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 3.41% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 10.02% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 13.01% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 17.75% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 18.57% | +1.41% |
FELG vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FELG vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison
FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than FDSSX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund | 4.14% | 4.79% | 4.83% | 2.03% | 0.36% | 0.84% | 5.22% | 6.09% | 4.46% | 3.07% | 1.04% | 5.16% |
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.44% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FELG and FDSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FELG has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to FDSSX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELG dropped -23.89% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.
FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELG and FDSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer