FELG vs. EGUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) and EGUS (Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FELG is actively managed, while EGUS is passively managed. Over the past year, FELG returned 27.58% vs 32.26% for EGUS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

FELG vs. EGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than EGUS's 12.08% return.

FELG

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EGUS

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 8.21%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 6M: 11.25%
• 1Y: 32.26%
• 3Y*: 26.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELG vs. EGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	7.70%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%
EGUS Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF	12.08%	19.02%	32.85%	4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FELG and EGUS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.98

The correlation between FELG and EGUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

FELG vs. EGUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FELG	EGUS
Technology	53.9%	59.1%
Communication Services	13.8%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	13.9%
Industrials	7.2%	6.8%
Healthcare	6.3%	5.9%
Financial Services	4.7%	4.3%
Energy	1.1%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	0.5%	0.7%
Utilities	0.1%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.0%	1.3%

Return for Risk

FELG vs. EGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 44
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

EGUS

EGUS Risk / Return Rank: 51
EGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
EGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELG vs. EGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELG	EGUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.99	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.64	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	2.07	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	7.03	-1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FELG vs. EGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EGUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELG and EGUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELG	EGUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.99	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	1.45	-0.13

Drawdowns

FELG vs. EGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, roughly equal to the maximum EGUS drawdown of -24.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and EGUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELG	EGUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.89%	-24.87%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-15.66%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-1.06%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-3.37%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	4.60%	+0.12%

Volatility

FELG vs. EGUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is 3.50%, while Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF (EGUS) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that FELG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELG	EGUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	3.98%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	12.67%	-1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	16.34%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.89%	19.15%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.89%	19.15%	+0.74%

FELG vs. EGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FELG and EGUS have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FELG vs. EGUS - Dividend Comparison

FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than EGUS's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EGUS Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF	0.19%	0.22%	0.25%	0.36%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELG and EGUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FELG and EGUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FELG or EGUS?

EGUS has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to FELG (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELG dropped -23.89% vs EGUS's -24.87%.

Which ETF is better, FELG or EGUS?

On 1-year performance, EGUS leads with 32.26% vs 27.58% for FELG. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, FELG has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FELG or EGUS?

Over the 1-year period, EGUS has performed better with a 32.26% return vs 27.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FELG or EGUS?

FELG and EGUS have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FELG or EGUS?

FELG has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.19% for EGUS.

What is the main difference between FELG and EGUS?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.