FELCX vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FELCX (Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both funds - FELCX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, FELCX returned 32.18%/yr vs 34.16%/yr for SMH. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FELCX charges 1.76%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

FELCX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELCX achieves a 47.33% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 50.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FELCX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 32.18%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 34.16% annualized return.

FELCX

• 1D: 7.41%
• 1M: -8.99%
• 6M: 31.99%
• YTD: 47.33%
• 1Y: 83.68%
• 3Y*: 45.19%
• 5Y*: 34.21%
• 10Y*: 32.18%
• ALL TIME*: 13.74%

SMH

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -8.74%
• 6M: 33.97%
• YTD: 50.09%
• 1Y: 90.95%
• 3Y*: 50.56%
• 5Y*: 33.46%
• 10Y*: 34.16%
• ALL TIME*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.28B	$7.64B	$7.07B

FELCX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C	47.33%	43.80%	42.66%	73.83%	-35.56%	56.29%	42.50%	62.54%	-13.48%	33.04%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	50.09%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FELCX and SMH is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2000	0.96

The correlation between FELCX and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

FELCX vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FELCX	SMH
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FELCX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FELCX

FELCX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FELCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FELCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FELCX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FELCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FELCX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 87
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FELCX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FELCX	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.29	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.70	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.36	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.58	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.36	14.64	-2.29

FELCX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELCX and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FELCX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELCX drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELCX and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELCX	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.55%	-84.96%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.96%	-24.62%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.53%	-35.74%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.47%	-45.30%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.47%	-45.30%	-1.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.55%	-19.19%	-2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.49%	-40.89%	+17.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.38%	6.01%	+0.37%

Volatility

FELCX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) has a higher volatility of 16.85% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.70%. This indicates that FELCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELCX	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.85%	14.70%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.46%	33.13%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.70%	38.57%	+2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.85%	36.50%	+3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.49%	33.32%	+2.17%

FELCX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FELCX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C	5.67%	8.35%	8.97%	4.24%	4.07%	4.95%	5.13%	0.93%	22.41%	10.39%	0.14%	11.27%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELCX and SMH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FELCX and SMH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FELCX or SMH?

FELCX has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to SMH (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELCX dropped -72.55% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.