FELCX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FELCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
FELCX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FELCX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C | 7.22% | 43.80% | 42.66% | 73.83% | -35.56% | 56.29% | 42.50% | 62.54% | -13.48% | 33.04% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELCX achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FELCX has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 29.54%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.95% annualized return.
FELCX
- 1D
- 7.12%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 86.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.21%
- 5Y*
- 27.74%
- 10Y*
- 29.54%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FELCX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FELCX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FELCX
SCHG
FELCX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELCX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.21 | 0.76 | +1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 1.24 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 1.09 | +4.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.20 | 3.71 | +15.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELCX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 0.76 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.57 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.79 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between FELCX and SCHG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FELCX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C | 7.79% | 8.35% | 8.97% | 4.24% | 4.07% | 4.95% | 5.13% | 0.93% | 22.41% | 10.39% | 0.14% | 11.27% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FELCX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELCX drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELCX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELCX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.55% | -34.59% | -37.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -16.41% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.47% | -34.59% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.47% | -34.59% | -11.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -12.51% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -5.22% | -18.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 4.84% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FELCX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) has a higher volatility of 12.79% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that FELCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FELCX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.79% | 6.77% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.67% | 12.54% | +13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.19% | 22.45% | +17.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.07% | 22.31% | +15.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 21.51% | +12.91% |