PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FELCX vs. FSBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELCX achieves a 84.21% return, which is significantly higher than FSBDX's 19.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FELCX has outperformed FSBDX with an annualized return of 36.19%, while FSBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 22.78% annualized return.


FELCX

1D
6.40%
1M
26.11%
YTD
84.21%
6M
81.97%
1Y
167.52%
3Y*
62.30%
5Y*
42.49%
10Y*
36.19%

FSBDX

1D
0.88%
1M
9.67%
YTD
19.45%
6M
20.73%
1Y
46.29%
3Y*
33.31%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
22.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FELCX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C
84.21%43.80%42.66%73.83%-35.56%56.29%42.50%62.54%-13.48%33.04%
FSBDX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund
19.45%20.31%39.76%57.42%-37.20%22.53%62.77%33.24%4.53%35.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FELCX and FSBDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.82

The correlation between FELCX and FSBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FELCX vs. FSBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELCX
FELCX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FELCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FELCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FSBDX
FSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FELCXFSBDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.43

2.74

+2.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.28

3.50

+1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.46

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.99

3.85

+8.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

46.62

16.19

+30.43

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.43, which is higher than the FSBDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELCX and FSBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FELCXFSBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43

2.74

+2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.73

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.97

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.90

-0.46

Drawdowns

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELCX drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than FSBDX's maximum drawdown of -42.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELCX and FSBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FELCXFSBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.55%

-42.25%

-30.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-12.41%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.53%

-27.09%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.47%

-42.25%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

-42.25%

-4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.57%

-7.24%

-16.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.94%

+0.84%

Volatility

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) at 4.22%. This indicates that FELCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FELCXFSBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.91%

4.22%

+7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.31%

12.99%

+12.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.52%

17.43%

+15.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.34%

24.78%

+13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.70%

23.51%

+11.19%

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FSBDX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FELCX vs. FSBDX - Dividend Comparison

FELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than FSBDX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FELCX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C
4.53%8.35%8.97%4.24%4.07%4.95%5.13%0.93%22.41%10.39%0.14%11.27%
FSBDX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund
3.13%3.73%8.92%0.54%3.93%24.67%40.16%11.36%15.87%10.80%1.41%13.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FELCX and FSBDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELCX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to FSBDX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELCX dropped -72.55% vs FSBDX's -42.25%.

FELCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FELCX and FSBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer