FELC vs. VTI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FELC (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FELC is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past year, FELC returned 26.44% vs 23.70% for VTI. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FELC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

FELC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELC achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.18% return.

FELC

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 11.53%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 1Y: 26.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.44%

VTI

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 1.38%
• 6M: 9.81%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 20.38%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 14.66%
• ALL TIME*: 9.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF	$30.45M	$28.57M	$35.52M
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	$1.08B	$1.16B	$1.24B

FELC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF	13.57%	17.09%	25.25%	6.06%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	12.18%	17.10%	23.81%	6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FELC and VTI is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	0.98

The correlation between FELC and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

FELC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FELC	VTI
Technology	40.7%	36.1%
Financial Services	12.6%	11.8%
Communication Services	10.8%	9.1%
Industrials	10.1%	10.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	9.4%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.7%
Energy	2.7%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	4.3%
Utilities	1.5%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.9%

Return for Risk

FELC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FELC

FELC Risk / Return Rank: 84
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 87

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 78
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FELC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FELC	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.82	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	2.52	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	2.67	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.69	11.50	+1.19

FELC vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELC Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELC and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FELC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELC drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELC and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELC	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.59%	-55.45%	+36.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-8.92%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.89%	-7.98%	+6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.07%	+0.02%

Volatility

FELC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELC	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	3.78%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	10.33%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.92%	13.08%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	17.53%	-2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	18.31%	-3.14%

FELC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FELC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than VTI's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF	0.83%	0.92%	1.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELC and VTI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FELC and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FELC or VTI?

FELC has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to VTI (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELC dropped -18.59% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, FELC or VTI?

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 26.44% vs 23.70% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FELC or VTI?

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 26.44% return vs 23.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FELC or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FELC or VTI?

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.83% for FELC.

What is the main difference between FELC and VTI?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELC and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.