FELC vs. FLDB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FELC (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF) and FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FELC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FLDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FELC returned 28.58% vs 4.19% for FLDB. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FELC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FLDB.

Performance

FELC vs. FLDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELC achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than FLDB's 1.28% return.

FELC

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 11.57%
• 1Y: 28.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLDB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELC vs. FLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF	11.23%	17.09%	16.61%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	1.28%	4.93%	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FELC and FLDB is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	0.04

Return for Risk

FELC vs. FLDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELC

FELC Risk / Return Rank: 70
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FLDB

FLDB Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FLDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLDB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELC vs. FLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELC	FLDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	4.67	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	8.43	-5.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	2.11	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	25.08	-21.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.66	93.63	-78.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FELC vs. FLDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELC Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the FLDB Sharpe Ratio of 4.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELC and FLDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELC	FLDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	4.67	-2.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	3.56	-1.97

Drawdowns

FELC vs. FLDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELC drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, which is greater than FLDB's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELC and FLDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELC	FLDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.59%	-0.49%	-18.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-0.17%	-8.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.13%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-0.05%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	0.04%	+1.91%

Volatility

FELC vs. FLDB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) at 0.34%. This indicates that FELC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELC	FLDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	0.34%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	0.61%	+8.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	0.91%	+10.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	1.31%	+13.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	1.31%	+13.86%

FELC vs. FLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FELC vs. FLDB - Dividend Comparison

FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than FLDB's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF	0.85%	0.92%	1.03%	0.04%
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF	4.45%	4.72%	3.58%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELC and FLDB in my portfolio?

FELC and FLDB have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FELC or FLDB?

FELC has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to FLDB (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELC dropped -18.59% vs FLDB's -0.49%.

Which ETF is better, FELC or FLDB?

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 28.58% vs 4.19% for FLDB. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FLDB has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FELC or FLDB?

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 28.58% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FELC or FLDB?

FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FLDB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FELC or FLDB?

FLDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.85% for FELC.

What is the main difference between FELC and FLDB?

FELC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FLDB is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELC and 0.20% for FLDB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.