FEKFX vs. FBCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEKFX (Fidelity Equity-Income K6 Fund) and FBCGX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund) are both mutual funds - FEKFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBCGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FEKFX returned 10.86%/yr vs 17.18%/yr for FBCGX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEKFX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FBCGX.

Performance

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Equity-Income K6 Fund (FEKFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEKFX achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than FBCGX's 17.59% return.

FEKFX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 22.28%
• 3Y*: 17.96%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: —

FBCGX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 8.40%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 6M: 18.73%
• 1Y: 43.06%
• 3Y*: 32.20%
• 5Y*: 17.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FEKFX Fidelity Equity-Income K6 Fund	8.72%	19.03%	15.56%	10.81%	-4.77%	24.77%	6.83%	11.36%
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	17.59%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FEKFX and FBCGX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019	0.64

The correlation between FEKFX and FBCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FEKFX vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEKFX

FEKFX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FEKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FEKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FEKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FEKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FEKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Equity-Income K6 Fund (FEKFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEKFX	FBCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.54	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.28	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	3.55	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.33	14.82	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEKFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEKFX and FBCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEKFX	FBCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.54	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.69	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.87	-0.10

Drawdowns

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEKFX drawdown since its inception was -33.16%, smaller than the maximum FBCGX drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEKFX and FBCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEKFX	FBCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.16%	-42.55%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-12.64%	+6.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.02%	-26.83%	+13.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.03%	-42.55%	+25.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	0.00%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-8.89%	+5.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	3.01%	-1.41%

Volatility

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Equity-Income K6 Fund (FEKFX) is 2.38%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that FEKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEKFX	FBCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	4.12%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	13.12%	-5.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.51%	17.67%	-8.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	24.97%	-11.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.01%	24.87%	-7.86%

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEKFX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEKFX vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison

FEKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than FBCGX's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	0.82%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%
FEKFX Fidelity Equity-Income K6 Fund	2.87%	2.79%	3.26%	1.96%	1.94%	3.65%	1.84%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEKFX and FBCGX in my portfolio?

FEKFX and FBCGX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEKFX or FBCGX?

FBCGX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to FEKFX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEKFX dropped -33.16% vs FBCGX's -42.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.