PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEGE vs. ROE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEGE vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEGE achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.


FEGE

1D
-0.99%
1M
2.80%
YTD
8.48%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROE

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.10%
YTD
20.98%
6M
21.56%
1Y
37.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEGE vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
8.48%34.19%-1.12%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
20.98%17.20%-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FEGE and ROE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.75

The correlation between FEGE and ROE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEGE vs. ROE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEGE
ROE

Consumer Defensive

14.7%
4.7%

Technology

14.1%
36.1%

Financial Services

12.0%
11.7%

Healthcare

11.8%
8.7%

Industrials

10.2%
9.8%

Energy

9.1%
3.5%

Communication Services

8.9%
10.6%

Basic Materials

8.8%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
9.4%

Real Estate

4.0%
1.9%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FEGE
14.7%
ROE
4.7%

Technology

FEGE
14.1%
ROE
36.1%

Financial Services

FEGE
12.0%
ROE
11.7%

Healthcare

FEGE
11.8%
ROE
8.7%

Industrials

FEGE
10.2%
ROE
9.8%

Energy

FEGE
9.1%
ROE
3.5%

Communication Services

FEGE
8.9%
ROE
10.6%

Basic Materials

FEGE
8.8%
ROE
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FEGE
6.5%
ROE
9.4%

Real Estate

FEGE
4.0%
ROE
1.9%

Utilities

FEGE

-

ROE
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEGE vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEGE
FEGE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FEGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEGE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FEGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEGE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ROE
ROE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEGE vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEGEROEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

2.74

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

3.69

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

4.41

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.22

19.92

-10.70

FEGE vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEGE and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEGEROEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.74

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

1.39

+0.59

Drawdowns

FEGE vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEGE drawdown since its inception was -11.13%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEGE and ROE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEGEROEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-19.10%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-8.66%

-2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-0.04%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-2.59%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

1.91%

+1.21%

Volatility

FEGE vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) is 3.43%, while Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that FEGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEGEROEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.79%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

10.66%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

13.94%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

15.78%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

15.78%

-1.15%

FEGE vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEGE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEGE vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

FEGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than ROE's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
1.18%1.28%0.00%0.00%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
0.94%0.97%1.18%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEGE and ROE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROE has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FEGE (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEGE dropped -11.13% vs ROE's -19.10%.

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 37.99% vs 28.67% for FEGE. On fees, ROE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FEGE has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 37.99% return vs 28.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEGE.

FEGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.94% for ROE.

They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEGE and 0.49% for ROE.

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEGE and ROE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer