FEDTX vs. FAMKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX).
FEDTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. FAMKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 29, 2004.
Performance
FEDTX vs. FAMKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEDTX vs. FAMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDTX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M | 3.99% | 31.19% | -4.16% | 20.12% | -12.35% | 6.05% | 16.31% | 18.91% | -19.40% | 36.42% |
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 0.85% | 39.76% | 9.01% | 8.12% | -20.09% | -2.90% | 30.05% | 29.29% | -18.32% | 46.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDTX achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly higher than FAMKX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDTX has underperformed FAMKX with an annualized return of 8.96%, while FAMKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.
FEDTX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
FAMKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEDTX vs. FAMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDTX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMKX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEDTX vs. FAMKX — Risk / Return Rank
FEDTX
FAMKX
FEDTX vs. FAMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDTX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | 1.74 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 2.22 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.34 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.13 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | 8.25 | +4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDTX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.74 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.24 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.54 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDTX and FAMKX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEDTX vs. FAMKX - Dividend Comparison
FEDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than FAMKX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDTX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M | 4.14% | 4.31% | 3.30% | 1.63% | 1.10% | 11.36% | 0.05% | 0.48% | 0.87% | 1.51% | 0.95% | 0.22% |
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 1.32% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.76% | 4.87% | 1.84% | 10.64% | 0.17% | 0.10% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FEDTX vs. FAMKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDTX drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, smaller than the maximum FAMKX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDTX and FAMKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDTX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.70% | -70.11% | +26.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -13.73% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -40.76% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.70% | -42.16% | -1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.62% | -13.73% | +4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -20.60% | +11.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.55% | -1.02% |
Volatility
FEDTX vs. FAMKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX) is 6.43%, while Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that FEDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEDTX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 8.51% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 13.09% | -3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 18.40% | -4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 18.46% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 18.56% | -2.93% |