FEDGX vs. EMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF).
FEDGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. EMF is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 27, 1987.
Performance
FEDGX vs. EMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEDGX vs. EMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDGX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C | 5.82% | 30.50% | -4.59% | 19.45% | -12.76% | 5.51% | 15.73% | 18.27% | -19.70% | 35.93% |
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 6.77% | 58.20% | 6.56% | 8.84% | -21.53% | -8.23% | 24.48% | 27.20% | -14.78% | 53.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDGX achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than EMF's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDGX has underperformed EMF with an annualized return of 8.65%, while EMF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.
FEDGX
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 35.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
EMF
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 53.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEDGX vs. EMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDGX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EMF's 1.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEDGX vs. EMF — Risk / Return Rank
FEDGX
EMF
FEDGX vs. EMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDGX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 2.43 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 2.92 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.80 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 11.49 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDGX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.43 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.32 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.63 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.20 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDGX and EMF is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEDGX vs. EMF - Dividend Comparison
FEDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than EMF's 9.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDGX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C | 3.60% | 3.81% | 3.01% | 1.09% | 0.57% | 10.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 1.54% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 9.22% | 9.73% | 4.28% | 6.22% | 9.89% | 6.92% | 3.51% | 7.36% | 5.92% | 12.11% | 1.62% | 12.81% |
Drawdowns
FEDGX vs. EMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDGX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, smaller than the maximum EMF drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDGX and EMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDGX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.26% | -76.97% | +32.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -19.48% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.29% | -45.87% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.26% | -47.65% | +3.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.97% | -13.45% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -29.12% | +19.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 4.74% | -2.15% |
Volatility
FEDGX vs. EMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) is 6.74%, while Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a volatility of 11.00%. This indicates that FEDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEDGX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 11.00% | -4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 17.42% | -7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 22.24% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 19.88% | -5.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 20.30% | -4.65% |