PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDF.L vs. PACW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEDF.L is traded in USD, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDF.L achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 12.52% return.


FEDF.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
2.27%

PACW.L

1D
0.67%
1M
5.51%
YTD
12.52%
6M
14.28%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEDF.L and PACW.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDF.L
FEDF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PACW.L
PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDF.LPACW.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.93

2.67

+4.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

13.57

3.87

+9.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.13

1.49

+1.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

29.74

3.36

+26.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

172.34

14.57

+157.78

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.93, which is higher than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDF.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDF.LPACW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93

2.67

+4.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

8.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

6.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.28

1.56

+4.72

Drawdowns

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDF.L drawdown since its inception was -0.28%, smaller than the maximum PACW.L drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDF.L and PACW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDF.LPACW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-16.93%

+16.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-9.14%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-1.98%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

2.11%

-2.09%

Volatility

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) is 0.11%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that FEDF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDF.LPACW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

3.25%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

9.13%

-8.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56%

11.79%

-11.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.42%

15.36%

-14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.35%

15.36%

-15.01%

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDF.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEDF.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

FEDF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FEDF.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for FEDF.L.

FEDF.L is categorized as Money Market, while PACW.L is Global Equities. FEDF.L tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FEDF.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDF.L and PACW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer