PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDDX vs. AVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDDX vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDDX achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than AVES's 16.79% return.


FEDDX

1D
0.66%
1M
1.50%
YTD
20.05%
6M
22.07%
1Y
40.71%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
10.95%

AVES

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.98%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.15%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDDX vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
20.05%31.90%-3.68%20.76%-11.83%-2.93%
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
16.79%30.49%4.50%16.79%-16.04%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDDX and AVES is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.87

The correlation between FEDDX and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDDX vs. AVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEDDX
AVES

Industrials

24.7%
13.3%

Financial Services

19.2%
25.3%

Technology

13.1%
21.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
3.2%

Healthcare

6.4%
2.1%

Basic Materials

6.3%
9.8%

Energy

3.6%
4.0%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.1%
5.3%

Utilities

1.1%
1.7%

Industrials

FEDDX
24.7%
AVES
13.3%

Financial Services

FEDDX
19.2%
AVES
25.3%

Technology

FEDDX
13.1%
AVES
21.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FEDDX
11.2%
AVES
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

FEDDX
9.5%
AVES
3.2%

Healthcare

FEDDX
6.4%
AVES
2.1%

Basic Materials

FEDDX
6.3%
AVES
9.8%

Energy

FEDDX
3.6%
AVES
4.0%

Real Estate

FEDDX
2.9%
AVES
2.4%

Communication Services

FEDDX
2.1%
AVES
5.3%

Utilities

FEDDX
1.1%
AVES
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDDX vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDDX
FEDDX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FEDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDDX vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDDXAVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.40

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

2.92

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.61

10.84

+5.76

FEDDX vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the AVES Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDDX and AVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDDXAVESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

2.19

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.61

-0.03

Drawdowns

FEDDX vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDDX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDDX and AVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDDXAVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.95%

-27.40%

-15.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-12.90%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-18.50%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-1.36%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-7.73%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.47%

-0.99%

Volatility

FEDDX vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) is 4.39%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that FEDDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDDXAVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

6.93%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

14.44%

-3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

17.19%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

16.98%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

16.98%

-1.24%

FEDDX vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDDX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDDX vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

FEDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than AVES's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.81%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
3.87%4.65%3.99%2.05%1.69%11.90%0.59%1.05%1.88%1.50%1.36%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDDX and AVES have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVES has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to FEDDX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDDX dropped -42.95% vs AVES's -27.40%.

FEDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDDX and AVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer