PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FECGX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FECGX achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly higher than WMKSX's 15.00% return.


FECGX

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.54%
YTD
17.43%
6M
18.05%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*

WMKSX

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.63%
YTD
15.00%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.75%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
17.43%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
15.00%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FECGX and WMKSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.93

The correlation between FECGX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FECGX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FECGXWMKSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.85

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

2.61

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.80

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.93

12.72

-2.78

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FECGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FECGX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FECGXWMKSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.85

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.39

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.37

+0.02

Drawdowns

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FECGX drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECGX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FECGXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-64.09%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-8.50%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.45%

-24.20%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.34%

-39.84%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.94%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

-15.68%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

2.54%

+1.56%

Volatility

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.74%. This indicates that FECGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FECGXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

4.74%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

12.05%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.38%

17.73%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

26.10%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

23.97%

+3.22%

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FECGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

FECGX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than WMKSX's 19.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
19.92%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FECGX and WMKSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FECGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to WMKSX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FECGX dropped -41.85% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FECGX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer