FECGX vs. MTUL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FECGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund) and MTUL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN) are both funds - FECGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MTUL is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index. Over the past 5 years, FECGX returned 5.85%/yr vs 20.61%/yr for MTUL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FECGX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MTUL.

Performance

FECGX vs. MTUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FECGX achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly lower than MTUL's 61.42% return.

FECGX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 4.54%
• YTD: 17.43%
• 6M: 18.05%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 5.85%
• 10Y*: —

MTUL

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: 28.31%
• YTD: 61.42%
• 6M: 62.09%
• 1Y: 78.29%
• 3Y*: 59.88%
• 5Y*: 20.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FECGX vs. MTUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund	17.43%	13.04%	15.26%	18.90%	-26.17%	-9.77%
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	61.42%	27.42%	58.70%	10.66%	-37.97%	7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FECGX and MTUL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021	0.75

The correlation between FECGX and MTUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FECGX vs. MTUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FECGX

FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

MTUL

MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 58
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FECGX vs. MTUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FECGX	MTUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.79	+0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.38	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.37	-0.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	13.47	-3.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FECGX vs. MTUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FECGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the MTUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FECGX and MTUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FECGX	MTUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	1.79	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.48	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.41	-0.02

Drawdowns

FECGX vs. MTUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FECGX drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum MTUL drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECGX and MTUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FECGX	MTUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.85%	-56.83%	+14.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.81%	-23.86%	+9.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.45%	-39.15%	+10.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.34%	-56.83%	+16.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-22.69%	+6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	5.96%	-1.86%

Volatility

FECGX vs. MTUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) is 6.43%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a volatility of 20.26%. This indicates that FECGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FECGX	MTUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	20.26%	-13.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	37.70%	-21.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.38%	43.98%	-22.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	42.81%	-18.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.19%	43.66%	-16.47%

FECGX vs. MTUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FECGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FECGX vs. MTUL - Dividend Comparison

FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund	0.46%	0.54%	1.25%	0.81%	0.80%	3.43%	1.00%	0.29%
MTUL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FECGX and MTUL in my portfolio?

FECGX and MTUL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FECGX or MTUL?

MTUL has higher volatility (20.26%) compared to FECGX (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FECGX dropped -41.85% vs MTUL's -56.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.