FECGX vs. ALFAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FECGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund) and ALFAX (Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FECGX returned 6.22%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for ALFAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FECGX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for ALFAX.

Performance

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FECGX having a 18.46% return and ALFAX slightly higher at 18.69%.

FECGX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 18.46%
• 6M: 16.79%
• 1Y: 39.39%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: —

ALFAX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 32.77%
• 3Y*: 15.74%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund	18.46%	13.04%	15.26%	18.90%	-26.17%	2.83%	34.41%	7.11%
ALFAX Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund	18.69%	8.80%	13.18%	13.92%	-23.50%	15.01%	26.16%	4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FECGX and ALFAX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019	0.96

The correlation between FECGX and ALFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FECGX vs. ALFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FECGX

FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

ALFAX

ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FECGX	ALFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.03	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.87	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	3.31	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.20	12.75	-2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FECGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ALFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FECGX and ALFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FECGX	ALFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.03	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.26	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.43	-0.04

Drawdowns

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FECGX drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum ALFAX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECGX and ALFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FECGX	ALFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.85%	-57.11%	+15.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.81%	-10.31%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.45%	-25.01%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.34%	-33.88%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.31%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.76%	-12.87%	-2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	2.67%	+1.43%

Volatility

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) at 5.84%. This indicates that FECGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FECGX	ALFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.44%	5.84%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	13.10%	+2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.35%	16.86%	+4.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	19.86%	+4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.19%	20.72%	+6.47%

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FECGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ALFAX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FECGX vs. ALFAX - Dividend Comparison

FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than ALFAX's 4.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALFAX Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund	4.47%	5.30%	0.80%	0.46%	6.94%	5.38%	7.99%	14.66%	16.61%	11.96%	11.85%	15.83%
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund	0.46%	0.54%	1.25%	0.81%	0.80%	3.43%	1.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FECGX and ALFAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FECGX and ALFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FECGX or ALFAX?

FECGX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to ALFAX (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FECGX dropped -41.85% vs ALFAX's -57.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.