FEBZ vs. TWOX
FEBZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF) and TWOX (iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. FEBZ is passively managed, while TWOX is actively managed. Over the past year, FEBZ returned 20.13% vs 16.12% for TWOX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEBZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TWOX.
Performance
FEBZ vs. TWOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEBZ achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than TWOX's 2.15% return.
FEBZ
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TWOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEBZ vs. TWOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF | 7.99% | 11.99% |
TWOX iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF | 2.15% | 13.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEBZ and TWOX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FEBZ and TWOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEBZ vs. TWOX — Risk / Return Rank
FEBZ
TWOX
FEBZ vs. TWOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEBZ | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 1.70 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.21 | 8.04 | +4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEBZ | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.55 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.67 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
FEBZ vs. TWOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEBZ drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum TWOX drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBZ and TWOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEBZ | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -19.35% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -9.51% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.02% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -2.64% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 2.01% | -0.36% |
Volatility
FEBZ vs. TWOX - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) at 0.49%. This indicates that FEBZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEBZ | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 0.49% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 8.25% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.34% | 10.44% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 16.78% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 16.78% | -4.43% |
FEBZ vs. TWOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEBZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TWOX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEBZ vs. TWOX - Dividend Comparison
FEBZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than TWOX's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF | 2.96% | 3.20% | 3.88% | 6.81% |
TWOX iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF | 0.55% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FEBZ and TWOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEBZ has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to TWOX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBZ dropped -17.50% vs TWOX's -19.35%.
On 1-year performance, FEBZ leads with 20.13% vs 16.12% for TWOX. On fees, TWOX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TWOX has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEBZ has performed better with a 20.13% return vs 16.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TWOX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FEBZ.
FEBZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.55% for TWOX.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FEBZ and 0.50% for TWOX.
FEBZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEBZ and TWOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer