FEBZ vs. JUNZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FEBZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF) and JUNZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from TrueShares - FEBZ tracks the S&P 500 Price Index while JUNZ tracks the S&P 500 Price Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEBZ returned 10.55%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for JUNZ. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBZ achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than JUNZ's 6.26% return.

FEBZ

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 15.91%
• 3Y*: 14.52%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: —

JUNZ

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.72%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 16.83%
• 3Y*: 14.95%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	5.77%	12.97%	16.88%	20.65%	-10.32%	10.83%
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	6.26%	12.83%	17.32%	17.28%	-12.97%	9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBZ and JUNZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2021	0.98

The correlation between FEBZ and JUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEBZ vs. JUNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBZ

FEBZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
FEBZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FEBZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FEBZ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FEBZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FEBZ Martin Ratio Rank: 60

JUNZ

JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBZ	JUNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.64	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.30	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	2.04	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	8.78	+0.53

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the JUNZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBZ and JUNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBZ drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, roughly equal to the maximum JUNZ drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBZ and JUNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBZ	JUNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-17.88%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-8.27%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-14.06%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.50%	-17.88%	+0.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-2.38%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-4.24%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.92%	-0.21%

Volatility

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) have volatilities of 3.51% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBZ	JUNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	3.38%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.64%	8.27%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	10.32%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.54%	11.81%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.37%	11.75%	+0.62%

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FEBZ and JUNZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

FEBZ vs. JUNZ - Dividend Comparison

FEBZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than JUNZ's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	3.02%	3.20%	3.88%	6.81%	0.00%	0.00%
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	2.16%	2.30%	3.97%	6.03%	0.56%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBZ and JUNZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FEBZ and JUNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEBZ or JUNZ?

FEBZ has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to JUNZ (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBZ dropped -17.50% vs JUNZ's -17.88%.

Which ETF is better, FEBZ or JUNZ?

On 5-year performance, FEBZ leads with 10.55% vs 9.25% for JUNZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBZ or JUNZ?

Over the 5-year period, FEBZ has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBZ or JUNZ?

FEBZ and JUNZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBZ or JUNZ?

FEBZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 2.16% for JUNZ.

What is the main difference between FEBZ and JUNZ?

FEBZ tracks S&P 500 Price Index, while JUNZ tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.