PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEBU vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEBU vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBU achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 66.08% return.


FEBU

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.81%
6M
5.42%
YTD
7.39%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
6.87%
1M
-1.18%
6M
62.18%
YTD
66.08%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBU vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEBU and DBE is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025

-0.13

The correlation between FEBU and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEBU vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBU
FEBU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FEBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBU vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEBUDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.16

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

6.57

+2.58

FEBU vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBU Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBU and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEBU vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBU drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBU and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEBUDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-86.69%

+74.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-24.72%

+18.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-36.95%

+35.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-57.20%

+55.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

8.13%

-6.46%

Volatility

FEBU vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU) is 3.10%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that FEBU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEBUDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

12.49%

-9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

32.73%

-25.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.90%

36.03%

-26.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

29.89%

-18.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

28.40%

-16.90%

FEBU vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEBU vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

FEBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.33%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
FEBU
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEBU and DBE have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.49%) compared to FEBU (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBU dropped -11.73% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 53.22% vs 15.27% for FEBU. On fees, FEBU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FEBU has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 53.22% return vs 15.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEBU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for FEBU.

FEBU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBU and 0.78% for DBE.

FEBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEBU and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer