FEBP vs. OILK
FEBP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEBP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by PGIM, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. FEBP is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past year, FEBP returned 18.57% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. FEBP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
FEBP vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEBP achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
FEBP
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FEBP vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February | 6.79% | 12.06% | 12.73% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEBP and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024 | -0.05 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FEBP and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.28, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEBP vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
FEBP
OILK
FEBP vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEBP | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.42 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.60 | 6.91 | +10.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEBP | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.06 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.12 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
FEBP vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEBP drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBP and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEBP | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -83.76% | +71.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.47% | -17.35% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.66% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -32.61% | +31.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 8.56% | -7.50% |
Volatility
FEBP vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) is 1.42%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FEBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEBP | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 10.44% | -9.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.44% | 23.26% | -17.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.96% | 28.75% | -21.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.98% | 30.12% | -21.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.98% | 35.97% | -26.99% |
FEBP vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEBP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEBP vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
FEBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEBP and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FEBP (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBP dropped -12.11% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 18.57% for FEBP. On fees, FEBP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FEBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 18.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEBP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for FEBP.
FEBP is categorized as Options Trading, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEBP and 0.68% for OILK.
FEBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEBP and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer