PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEBGX vs. MCFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund (FEBGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBGX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -1.21% return.


FEBGX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.41%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
10Y*

MCFIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-1.21%
6M
-0.92%
1Y
2.77%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEBGX
Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund
0.27%7.04%1.60%5.35%-13.98%-0.06%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
-1.21%6.64%2.02%6.47%-13.69%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBGX and MCFIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021

0.93

The correlation between FEBGX and MCFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEBGX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBGX
FEBGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FEBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MCFIX
MCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund (FEBGX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEBGXMCFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

0.77

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

2.16

+2.16

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the MCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBGX and MCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEBGXMCFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.70

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.14

-0.18

Drawdowns

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBGX drawdown since its inception was -19.47%, smaller than the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBGX and MCFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEBGXMCFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.47%

-21.68%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-3.75%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

-6.32%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-6.18%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-8.54%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.29%

-0.28%

Volatility

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund (FEBGX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) at 1.29%. This indicates that FEBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEBGXMCFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.29%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.75%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

4.12%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

6.04%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

6.11%

-0.21%

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBGX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEBGX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison

FEBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than MCFIX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FEBGX
Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund
3.92%3.82%3.75%2.67%2.73%0.64%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
4.32%3.89%4.54%3.68%3.31%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEBGX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEBGX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to MCFIX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBGX dropped -19.47% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.

FEBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEBGX and MCFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer