FEBGX vs. ARINX
FEBGX (Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund) and ARINX (Archer Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, FEBGX returned 3.93%/yr vs 4.69%/yr for ARINX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEBGX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ARINX.
Performance
FEBGX vs. ARINX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEBGX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than ARINX's 0.59% return.
FEBGX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARINX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
FEBGX vs. ARINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEBGX Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund | 0.27% | 7.04% | 1.60% | 5.35% | -13.98% | -0.06% |
ARINX Archer Income Fund | 0.59% | 4.42% | 4.90% | 3.99% | -6.84% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEBGX and ARINX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FEBGX and ARINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEBGX vs. ARINX — Risk / Return Rank
FEBGX
ARINX
FEBGX vs. ARINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund (FEBGX) and Archer Income Fund (ARINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEBGX | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 2.42 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 8.39 | -4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEBGX | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.13 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.53 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
FEBGX vs. ARINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEBGX drawdown since its inception was -19.47%, which is greater than ARINX's maximum drawdown of -9.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBGX and ARINX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEBGX | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.47% | -9.38% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -1.57% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.38% | -1.57% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.63% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.79% | -1.72% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.45% | +0.56% |
Volatility
FEBGX vs. ARINX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund (FEBGX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Archer Income Fund (ARINX) at 0.76%. This indicates that FEBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEBGX | ARINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 0.76% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 1.46% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 1.79% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 2.06% | +3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 1.97% | +3.93% |
FEBGX vs. ARINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEBGX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ARINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEBGX vs. ARINX - Dividend Comparison
FEBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than ARINX's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARINX Archer Income Fund | 3.58% | 2.72% | 3.77% | 3.15% | 2.72% | 2.56% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.84% | 2.94% | 2.84% | 2.79% |
FEBGX Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund | 3.92% | 3.82% | 3.75% | 2.67% | 2.73% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEBGX and ARINX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEBGX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to ARINX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBGX dropped -19.47% vs ARINX's -9.38%.
ARINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEBGX and ARINX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer