FEBAX vs. PRFRX
FEBAX (First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A) and PRFRX (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund) are both mutual funds - FEBAX is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Eagle, while PRFRX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, FEBAX returned 8.71%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for PRFRX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEBAX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PRFRX.
Performance
FEBAX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEBAX achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than PRFRX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FEBAX has outperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.54% annualized return.
FEBAX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
PRFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
FEBAX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEBAX First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A | 7.04% | 26.23% | 8.12% | 7.85% | -3.55% | 11.39% | 4.74% | 14.92% | -6.50% | 12.96% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 0.95% | 9.82% | 11.04% | 13.78% | -1.95% | 4.60% | 1.75% | 8.46% | -0.08% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEBAX and PRFRX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2012 | 0.31 |
The correlation between FEBAX and PRFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEBAX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank
FEBAX
PRFRX
FEBAX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A (FEBAX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEBAX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 2.17 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 5.22 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 19.34 | -12.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEBAX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEBAX drawdown since its inception was -23.04%, which is greater than PRFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBAX and PRFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEBAX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.04% | -20.05% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -1.50% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.65% | -2.35% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.85% | -5.94% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.04% | -20.05% | -2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.59% | -0.44% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -0.69% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 0.40% | +2.34% |
Volatility
FEBAX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison
First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A (FEBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) at 0.63%. This indicates that FEBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEBAX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 0.63% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 1.85% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.82% | 2.65% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.01% | 2.91% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.26% | 3.92% | +5.34% |
FEBAX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEBAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEBAX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison
FEBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than PRFRX's 9.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEBAX First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A | 3.89% | 4.14% | 5.39% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 7.61% | 3.07% | 2.49% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.13% | 3.38% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 9.25% | 9.99% | 10.20% | 9.57% | 4.03% | 3.86% | 4.00% | 4.84% | 4.87% | 4.04% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEBAX and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEBAX has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to PRFRX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBAX dropped -23.04% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.
PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEBAX and PRFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer