FERIX vs. MSAQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX).
FERIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999. MSAQX is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Dec 28, 2015.
Performance
FERIX vs. MSAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FERIX vs. MSAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I | 0.92% | 37.04% | 20.95% | 13.84% | -30.60% | -14.83% | 72.97% | 31.02% | -14.87% | 45.94% |
MSAQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio | -11.91% | 2.06% | 19.71% | -6.83% | -22.01% | -20.52% | 52.55% | 44.74% | -13.64% | 76.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FERIX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than MSAQX's -11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FERIX has outperformed MSAQX with an annualized return of 12.65%, while MSAQX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.
FERIX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 34.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
MSAQX
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -15.56%
- YTD
- -11.91%
- 6M
- -21.86%
- 1Y
- -11.91%
- 3Y*
- -0.57%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FERIX vs. MSAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FERIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than MSAQX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FERIX vs. MSAQX — Risk / Return Rank
FERIX
MSAQX
FERIX vs. MSAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FERIX | MSAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | -0.62 | +2.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | -0.73 | +2.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.90 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | -0.58 | +2.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | -1.63 | +9.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FERIX | MSAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | -0.62 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | -0.39 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.35 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FERIX and MSAQX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FERIX vs. MSAQX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FERIX nor MSAQX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 12.49% | 6.58% | 5.30% | 6.70% | 0.03% | 1.29% | 0.82% |
MSAQX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.82% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 1.06% | 0.05% | 0.69% | 1.12% | 2.24% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FERIX vs. MSAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FERIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, roughly equal to the maximum MSAQX drawdown of -61.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERIX and MSAQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FERIX | MSAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -61.11% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -23.57% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.29% | -54.44% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.71% | -61.11% | +3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.53% | -49.26% | +35.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -24.17% | +5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 8.34% | -4.61% |
Volatility
FERIX vs. MSAQX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) have volatilities of 9.61% and 10.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FERIX | MSAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.61% | 10.10% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 15.58% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 20.48% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 24.07% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 22.04% | -1.34% |