FEAT vs. MRNY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. FEAT is passively managed, while MRNY is actively managed. Over the past year, FEAT returned -14.57% vs 54.97% for MRNY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEAT charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MRNY.

Performance

FEAT vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 89.76% return.

FEAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: -8.33%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 1Y: -14.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MRNY

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 24.71%
• 6M: 67.73%
• YTD: 89.76%
• 1Y: 54.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAT vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	-6.78%	-4.21%	-9.44%
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF	89.76%	-35.72%	0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAT and MRNY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

FEAT vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MRNY

MRNY Risk / Return Rank: 38
MRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
MRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAT vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAT	MRNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	1.04	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	1.77	-2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.21	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	1.75	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	3.38	-4.22

FEAT vs. MRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the MRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAT and MRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAT vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and MRNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAT	MRNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.68%	-82.15%	+50.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	-31.53%	-0.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.04%	-60.05%	+40.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.69%	-52.96%	+39.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.61%	16.31%	+0.30%

Volatility

FEAT vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is 7.94%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 20.48%. This indicates that FEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAT	MRNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.94%	20.48%	-12.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	39.62%	-19.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.72%	53.03%	-24.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	51.56%	-21.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.17%	51.56%	-21.39%

FEAT vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAT vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison

FEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	77.86%	76.35%	0.00%	0.00%
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF	88.03%	145.98%	178.49%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAT and MRNY in my portfolio?

FEAT and MRNY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAT or MRNY?

MRNY has higher volatility (20.48%) compared to FEAT (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAT dropped -31.68% vs MRNY's -82.15%.

Which ETF is better, FEAT or MRNY?

On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 54.97% vs -14.57% for FEAT. On fees, MRNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, FEAT has been the lower-risk option at 7.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEAT or MRNY?

Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 54.97% return vs -14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEAT or MRNY?

MRNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for FEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEAT or MRNY?

MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 88.03%, compared with 77.86% for FEAT.

What is the main difference between FEAT and MRNY?

Their fees differ too: 1.28% for FEAT and 0.99% for MRNY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.