FEAT vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FEAT is passively managed, while IPDP is actively managed. FEAT charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

FEAT vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FEAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 6M: -8.34%
• 1Y: -10.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAT vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	11.29%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

FEAT vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAT

FEAT Risk / Return Rank: 6
FEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IPDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAT vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAT	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.62	—	—

Drawdowns

FEAT vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAT	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.68%	0.00%	-31.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.04%	0.00%	-20.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.61%	0.00%	-13.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEAT	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.78%	0.00%	+28.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.37%	0.00%	+30.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.37%	0.00%	+30.37%

FEAT vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAT vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.92%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	85.92%	76.35%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FEAT or IPDP?

On fees, FEAT is cheaper at 1.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEAT or IPDP?

FEAT is cheaper with a 1.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEAT or IPDP?

FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 85.92%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between FEAT and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for FEAT and 1.52% for IPDP.