FEAT vs. IPDP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FEAT is passively managed, while IPDP is actively managed. FEAT charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

FEAT vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FEAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: -8.33%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 1Y: -14.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAT vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	11.29%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

FEAT vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAT	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAT	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.04%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.69%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEAT	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.72%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.17%	—	—

FEAT vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAT vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEAT nor IPDP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	77.86%	76.35%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FEAT or IPDP?

On fees, FEAT is cheaper at 1.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEAT or IPDP?

FEAT is cheaper with a 1.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEAT or IPDP?

FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 77.86%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between FEAT and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for FEAT and 1.52% for IPDP.