FEAT vs. AMDY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FEAT is passively managed, while AMDY is actively managed. Over the past year, FEAT returned -14.57% vs 190.09% for AMDY. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEAT charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

FEAT vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 109.12% return.

FEAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: -8.33%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 1Y: -14.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDY

• 1D: -3.74%
• 1M: 5.57%
• 6M: 115.38%
• YTD: 109.12%
• 1Y: 190.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAT vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	-6.78%	-4.21%	-9.44%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	109.12%	53.93%	-2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAT and AMDY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024	0.57

The correlation between FEAT and AMDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEAT vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAT vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAT	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	3.34	-3.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	3.61	-4.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.49	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	6.93	-7.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	15.42	-16.26

FEAT vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAT and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAT vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAT	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.68%	-53.92%	+22.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	-27.59%	-4.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.04%	-6.08%	-13.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.69%	-17.53%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.61%	12.39%	+4.22%

Volatility

FEAT vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) is 7.94%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 19.13%. This indicates that FEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAT	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.94%	19.13%	-11.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	45.07%	-24.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.72%	57.35%	-28.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	47.17%	-17.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.17%	47.17%	-17.00%

FEAT vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAT vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

FEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	66.97%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	77.86%	76.35%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAT and AMDY in my portfolio?

FEAT and AMDY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAT or AMDY?

AMDY has higher volatility (19.13%) compared to FEAT (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAT dropped -31.68% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

Which ETF is better, FEAT or AMDY?

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 190.09% vs -14.57% for FEAT. On fees, AMDY is cheaper at 1.23% per year. On volatility, FEAT has been the lower-risk option at 7.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEAT or AMDY?

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 190.09% return vs -14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEAT or AMDY?

AMDY is cheaper with a 1.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for FEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEAT or AMDY?

FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 77.86%, compared with 66.97% for AMDY.

What is the main difference between FEAT and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for FEAT and 1.23% for AMDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.