PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.28% return.


FEAC

1D
-0.54%
1M
6.25%
YTD
12.42%
6M
13.00%
1Y
30.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
12.42%18.01%-1.69%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%-1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and SCHB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.97

The correlation between FEAC and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEACSCHBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

2.33

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

3.19

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

3.17

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.36

14.55

+1.81

FEAC vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEACSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.33

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.83

+0.27

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-35.27%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-8.91%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.72%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-4.12%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.94%

-0.08%

Volatility

FEAC vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 3.10% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

3.01%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

9.14%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

12.12%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

17.24%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

18.32%

-0.82%

FEAC vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEAC vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.85%0.94%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FEAC and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEAC has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 30.36% vs 28.12% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 30.36% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FEAC.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.85% for FEAC.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.03% for SCHB.

FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer