FEAC vs. ITOT
FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FEAC is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past year, FEAC returned 30.36% vs 28.12% for ITOT. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FEAC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
FEAC vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.
FEAC
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 30.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
FEAC vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 12.42% | 18.01% | -1.69% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | -1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAC and ITOT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FEAC and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAC vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
FEAC
ITOT
FEAC vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 3.17 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.36 | 14.57 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 2.32 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.57 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
FEAC vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -55.20% | +36.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -8.90% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.73% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -6.97% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.94% | -0.08% |
Volatility
FEAC vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.10% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 2.99% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 9.13% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 12.20% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.36% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 18.26% | -0.76% |
FEAC vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEAC vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FEAC and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEAC has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 30.36% vs 28.12% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 30.36% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FEAC.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.85% for FEAC.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.03% for ITOT.
FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAC and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer