PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FEAC

1D
0.47%
1M
6.39%
YTD
13.02%
6M
13.99%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
13.02%18.01%-1.69%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and FETH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEACFETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

-0.47

+3.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

-0.32

+3.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.97

+0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

-0.51

+4.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.41

-0.84

+18.25

FEAC vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEACFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

-0.47

+3.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

-0.41

+1.54

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-64.00%

+45.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-62.95%

+54.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-62.95%

+62.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-32.73%

+30.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

37.82%

-35.96%

Volatility

FEAC vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) is 3.07%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FEAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

9.99%

-6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

46.01%

-36.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

68.50%

-56.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

72.27%

-54.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

72.27%

-54.76%

FEAC vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEAC vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.85%0.94%0.12%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAC and FETH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FEAC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 32.02% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FEAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 32.02% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FEAC.

FEAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FEAC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.00% for FETH.

FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer