PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -28.83% return.


FEAC

1D
-1.46%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
9.92%
6M
8.83%
1Y
26.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-3.16%
1M
-17.78%
YTD
-28.83%
6M
-28.94%
1Y
-39.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
9.92%18.01%-1.87%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-28.83%-6.56%-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and FBTC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEACFBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.86

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

-0.77

+4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

-1.30

+14.94

FEAC vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-52.07%

+33.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-52.07%

+43.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-50.43%

+47.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-16.77%

+14.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

30.54%

-28.60%

Volatility

FEAC vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) is 5.35%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that FEAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

13.04%

-7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

34.56%

-24.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

44.18%

-30.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

50.08%

-32.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

50.08%

-32.44%

FEAC vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEAC vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.79%0.94%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAC and FBTC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to FEAC (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs FBTC's -52.07%.

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 26.41% vs -39.80% for FBTC. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FEAC has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 26.41% return vs -39.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

FEAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

FEAC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.25% for FBTC.

FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer