PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.34% return.


FEAC

1D
0.47%
1M
6.39%
YTD
13.02%
6M
13.99%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
13.02%18.01%-1.69%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-6.56%-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and FBTC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEACFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

-0.89

+3.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

-1.23

+4.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.86

+0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

-0.79

+4.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.41

-1.36

+18.77

FEAC vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEACFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

-0.89

+3.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.30

+0.83

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-49.33%

+30.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-49.33%

+41.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-48.00%

+48.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-16.01%

+13.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

28.41%

-26.55%

Volatility

FEAC vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) is 3.07%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that FEAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

9.39%

-6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

34.38%

-25.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

43.61%

-31.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

50.13%

-32.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

50.13%

-32.62%

FEAC vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEAC vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.85%0.94%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAC and FBTC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FEAC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 32.02% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FEAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 32.02% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

FEAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

FEAC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.25% for FBTC.

FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer